Cartesian forms
- not covered, as it is from year 11 notes
Factorisation of Polynomials
- A polynomial function is a sum of multiples of powers of a variable
- E.g.
- Degree/order of a polynomial is used to refer to the highest power of any variable in the polynomial
- The degree/order of the polynomial above is 7, because 7 is the highest power
- Usually, you write polynomials in order of decreasing power
- This is not set in stone, there are multiple ways to do it
What this topic is about
- We already know the following about quadratic polynomials
- If a quadratic equation , has solutions and , the LHS admits a factorisation -
- i.e. solutions correspond to linear factors of the polynomial
- This chapter extends this idea to higher degree polynomials
Arithmetic with polynomials
- Polynomials can be added or subtracted by combining like terms and simplifying
- Polynomials can be multiplied using the distributive law
- e.g.
- Polynomials can be divided using polynomial division
Division with integers
- Consider a positive integer , e.g. 100, and a strictly smaller positive integer , e.g. 23
- 100 is not divisible by 23, so there is a remainder when 100 is divided by 23
- Thus,
- must be the quotient
- must always be smaller than the number
- When a polynomial is divided by a polynomial , the degree of the remainder will be strictly smaller than the degree of
Important Fact!
When a polynomial is divided by a polynomial , the degree of the remainder will be strictly smaller than the degree of
Thus, , where is the quotient
Thus,
- Compare with numerical division: when 100 is divided by 23, the remainder is 8, which is smaller than 23, and
- Thus,
- True algebraic fraction
- Numerator has a lower degree than denominator
- Improper algebraic fraction
- Numerator has a higher degree than denominator
- In certain later topics (i.e. using partial fractions for integration), it will be necessary to rewrite improper algebraic fractions in terms of proper ones
- If and are polynomials then
- I.e. for any polynomials and , either is a factor of or there is a polynomial multiple of that differs from by a constant
The Remainder Theorem and the Factor Theorem
- Remember, if and are polynomials then
Remainder theorem:
for a polynomial and a number , the remainder when is divided by is
- Proof
- Let be the remainder when is divided by
- Thus, for some polynomial
- Hence, , as required
Factor Theorem
For a polynomial , is a factor of if and only if
- Proof 1
- Suppose is a factor of
- Then the remainder when is divided by is 0
- Thus, by the remainder theorem,
- Proof 2
- Conversely, suppose that
- Then the remainder when is divided by is 0
- Hence, is a factor of
Other stuff which is really useful to know (but not required in course content)
Theorem (the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra)
- Every real (real coefficients) polynomial equation of degree has exactly solutions (some of which may be repeated or complex)
- Every real polynomial of degree can be factorised as a product of linear factors where the are the zeroes of
Theorem (IMPORTANT!)
- If is a complex solution to a polynomial equation (with real coefficients), then so is
- Thus, complex solutions always come in conjugate pairs, so the total number of complex solutions (with non-zero imaginary part) is always even
- It also means that the total number of linear factors involving complex numbers is even
- Thus, any real polynomial of odd degree with have at least 1 real solution
- Odd degree: starts up/down and finishes down/up
- Even degree: starts up/down and finishes up/down
Theorem (Multiplicity of factors)
- Suppose that is a factor of . Then
- If is odd, the graph of cross the x-axis at
- If is even, the graph of ‘touches’ but does not cross the x-axis at
Polar Form of Complex numbers
-
An exam question says
-
The symbol could be
-
Addition and subtraction in this form are much easier than multiplication and division
-
Polar form is most natural form for multiplying/dividing complex numbers, or raising powers to complex numbers
-
Multiplying by rotates the point 90˚ anticlockwise about the origin on the Argand plane
-
When multiplying by a complex number , the things determining the corresponding geometric transformation are
- the distance from the origin (the magnitude/modulus)
- the angle from the positive real axis (the argument)
-
How to rewrite so that and are explicit
-
- where is the magnitude/modulus of , i.e. the distance from the origin
- is the principal argument (angle between the vector for and the real axis) and
Complex Conjugates in polar form
Recall for a complex number,
The complex conjugate is
Then, if ,
Multiplication of Complex Numbers
Proof
LHS = r_{1} \text{ cis } \alpha \times r_{2 } \text{ cis } \beta \\ \\ = r_{1 } r_{2} [(\cos \beta + i \sin \beta)(\cos \alpha + i \sin \alpha )] \\ \\ = r_{1} r_{2}( \cos \alpha \cos \beta + i \cos \alpha \sin \beta + i \sin \alpha + \cos \beta + i^2 \sin \alpha \sin \beta) \\ \\ = r_{1} r_{2 } (\cos \alpha \cos \beta - \sin \alpha \sin \beta + i (\sin \alpha \cos \beta + \cos \alpha \sin \beta)) \\ \\ = r_{1} r_{2}[(\cos \alpha + \beta) + i \sin (\alpha + \beta)] \\ \\ = r_{1} r_{2} \text{ cis } (\alpha + \beta) \end{align}Division of Complex Numbers
Regions in the Complex Plane
Set Notation
Analogue with real numbers:
i.e. all values of x such that those conditions are true
for complex numbers:
- circle centred at the origin, radius of 4
- some people call this the locus of
- Just shade the interior of the circle to show that the numbers inside the circle are also included
- Show the circumference as a dotted line
- Shade the interior of the circle to show that the numbers inside the circle are also included
Represent
- Make a line where the argument is radians
- Circle the origin, because is excluded from the set because its argument is undefined
Sometimes the region represented by a set isn’t obvious
- One possible strategy: think of coordinate geometry, i.e. represent this image as x and y coordinates then rearrange units until it is in a suitable plot-able form
- Alternatively, observe that is the distance between the complex numbers and
th roots of 1
In the real world: etc etc, alternating
However, has 4 solutions (1, -1, i, -i)
Consider which has just 1 real solution
We can solve using polynomial techniques, i.e. rewrite as and factorise LHS
Using quadratic formula:
Theorem: including complex numbers, there are solutions of 1. They have modulus 1 and are spaced at angular intervals of
More general theorem
Given a non-zero complex number , the total number of th roots of (including complex roots) is
The roots al have the same modulus, and are spaced at angular intervals of , i.e. form the vertices of a regular n-gon
De Moirves Theorem
Recall that in polar form:
Theorem: For any integer and complex number